relation to the Samitang Intinana. That
I do not perceive any particular question is raised for their papers. My decision, and can only refer you to my former Despatches of the 6th Pref. last relating to this Ordinance and of the 13th November last respecting the conduct of the Magistrate. I hope that W. Ravier will have been able, before this Despatch arrives, to send you sufficient
It seems to me clear on the face of the Ordinance that the Legislature intended it to have retrospective effect (so far as relates to buildings commenced before its enactment). But as far as I understand the subject, I am inclined to believe, notwithstanding the opinion of the Attorney General, that the error alleged to have been committed by
Page 379
2.
relation to the Samitang
Intinana.
That
L
I do
2. to rest perceive any particular question
is raised
for
bestheir papers
My decision, and can
nly afer you to my former
Despatches of the 6t Pref. last relating to this Ordinans and of the 13th November lost respecting the conduct If the Magistrater. I hope That SW. Ravier will have been able, before this Berpt: siriver, to bend you offinent
ས ས ས
11 1:|:
(
379
appistand.
3
97
Jeems
to me
deat on the face of the Cordi-
:nance that the Legislature
intended it to have
retrospective effect (30 far as relates to buildings
Cou=
-mound before it's quase =
= ment). But as far as I understand the subject,
I am mohind to believe,
entwithstanding the Pornos = tion of the Atorney Connais,
That the error
alleged to
have been committed by
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.